Subjects
Applied Mathematics for Electrical Engineering - 3130908
Complex Variables and Partial Differential Equations - 3130005
Engineering Graphics and Design - 3110013
Basic Electronics - 3110016
Mathematics-II - 3110015
Basic Civil Engineering - 3110004
Physics Group - II - 3110018
Basic Electrical Engineering - 3110005
Basic Mechanical Engineering - 3110006
Programming for Problem Solving - 3110003
Physics Group - I - 3110011
Mathematics-I - 3110014
English - 3110002
Environmental Science - 3110007
Software Engineering - 2160701
Data Structure - 2130702
Database Management Systems - 2130703
Operating System - 2140702
Advanced Java - 2160707
Compiler Design - 2170701
Data Mining And Business Intelligence - 2170715
Information And Network Security - 2170709
Mobile Computing And Wireless Communication - 2170710
Theory Of Computation - 2160704
Semester
Semester - 1
Semester - 2
Semester - 3
Semester - 4
Semester - 5
Semester - 6
Semester - 7
Semester - 8
Software Engineering
(2160701)
SE-2160701
Winter-2018
Question-4a-OR
BE | Semester-
6
Winter-2018
|
16-11-2018
Q4) (a)
3 Marks
Explain Formal Technical Review.
A formal technical review (FTR) is a software quality control activity performed by software engineers (and others)
The objectives of an FTR are:
To uncover errors in function, logic, or implementation; for any representation of the software
To verify that the software under review meets its requirements
To ensure that the software has been represented according to predefined standards
To achieve software that is developed in a uniform manner
To make projects more manageable
During the FTR, a reviewer (the recorder) actively records all issues that have been raised.
These are summarized at the end of the review meeting, and a reviewed issues list is produced.
In addition, a formal technical review summary report is completed.
Steps in FTR
The review meeting.
Review reporting and record keeping.
Review guidelines.
Guideline for review may include following things
Concentrate on work product only. That means review the product not the producers.
Set an agenda of a review and maintain it.
When certain issues are raised then debate or arguments should be limited. Reviews should not ultimately results in some hard feelings.
Find out problem areas, but don’t attempt to solve every problem noted.
Take written notes (it is for record purpose)
Limit the number of participants and insists upon advance preparation.
Develop a checklist for each product that is likely to be reviewed.
Allocate resources and time schedule for FTRs in order to maintain time schedule.
Conduct meaningful trainings for all reviewers in order to make reviews effective.
Reviews earlier reviews which serve as the base for the current review being conducted.
Questions
Go to Question Paper
Q1
(a)
(b)
(c)
Q2
(a)
(b)
(c)
(c)
Q3
(a)
(b)
(c)
Q3
(a)
(OR)
(b)
(OR)
(c)
(OR)
Q4
(a)
(b)
(c)
Q4
(a)
(OR)
(b)
(OR)
(c)
(OR)
Q5
(a)
(b)
(c)
Q5
(a)
(OR)
(b)
(OR)
(c)
(OR)